A recent International Data Corporation (IDC) survey confirms that conferencing applications were already in wide use at home and at work prior to the Covid-19 outbreak.
When the pandemic created the need to move in-person events to virtual meetings and conferences, these “connected consumers” brought along some expectations. To a large degree, they were looking to replicate their “in person” experiences in the virtual world.
Some of the most common activities when attending an event in person are engaging in conversation, socialising, and networking with other attendees as well as exchanging business cards.
Attendees at virtual events want to pursue similar activities by posting to social media, interacting with other social media handles, and exchanging LinkedIn addresses.
In fact, IDC found that nearly half of all attendees at virtual events engage using social media, compared to just 16% at in-person events. But few event organizers actively facilitated this kind of attendee interaction with less than half of the events offering live chat to ask questions of speakers or for audience interaction.
“Live events are an important source of information for attendees and this is a function that organizers can handle very well with live streaming and content downloads,” says Wayne Kurtzman, research director: social and collaboration at IDC.
“But an equally important reason to attend these events in person is the opportunity to meet and network with other people. Organisers still have some work to do here to deliver an experience that will be equally beneficial to a remote and distanced audience.”
The sudden shift to virtual events in the first half of 2020 produced mixed results in terms of attendance. While just over half of the events lost audience in the transition, 46% gained attendees as a result. Removing travel requirements and audience familiarity with video presentations worked together to keep event attendance largely intact.
Overall, about half of the attendees at these virtual events were neutral on their experience, more or less getting what they expected. But nearly a third indicated that they had a better experience than expected with some stating they had a better experience than an in-person event.
From an event organiser’s perspective, the virtual events were largely seen as a success. The metric used by most organisers to measure success was attendance, but downloads, revenue, and audience engagement also scored well.
In general, tech companies were more successful with audience engagement while companies with branded communities saw higher session attendance and greater social media hashtag usage. Overall, nearly half found the virtual event to be less expensive to produce than an in-person event.
When asked what could have been done better, event organisers and attendees both identified engagements during the event as one of the top areas for improvement along with audio quality (organisers) and the need for closed captions (attendees) on the technical side. Both groups also identified networking events as something warranting further attention.
“Looking ahead, virtual events are people’s new ‘real world’ events,” adds Kurtzman. “To succeed, make sure attendees have easy ways to engage with each other, the organizers, and speakers. Use platforms that were meant for the purpose and prepare the platform, your social team, and support teams. Finally, make the impression a good one with video, lighting, and audio – and usable, authentic content.”